[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CD-ROM drives for TP750C and OS/2
- To: msmith@netcom.com (Martin P. Smith)
- Subject: Re: CD-ROM drives for TP750C and OS/2
- From: Randal Whittle <whittle@chaph.usc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 1994 07:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: TP750@CS.UTK.EDU (TP)
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9406162251.A13275-0100000@netcom9> from "Martin P. Smith" at Jun 16, 94 10:52:16 pm
> Ah but try running powerbuilder under windows and a day or two will
> have you racing to OS/2. Powerbuilder crashes like crazy and my current
> client has a boot cycle on the order of two to thhree minutes.
>
> Martin P. Smith msmith@netcom.COM
First of all, I suppose I should admit I don't know what Powerbuilder
even *is*, so... :) Mind telling me what Powerbuilder does/is?
(On a side note: I've found that most apps that crash a Windows
setup a lot tend to do so because of sloppy programming. OS/2 just handles
such a program better than Windows does. I'd be more likely to trash such
sloppy software in favor of something else than to trash my operating
environment for something else--much less drastic.)
Second of all, I'll point out that their really aren't a whole lot
of OS/2 apps out there. I'm glad its growing larger, but for most of the
stuff I run--with the exception of Ami Pro and Freelance Graphics--don't have
OS/2 versions. Yes, I know the other stuff runs under Win-OS/2 (I use
virtually zero DOS apps--phased 'em out years ago, partly because Windows
doesn't run them very well), but IMO, not very well. As for PageMaker and
the others that *used* to have OS/2 versions, well--I don't want to step
backwards and used version 3.x when PM version 5 is in use. Part of the
reason I bought an Intel-based machine and not some Apple Mac was because
I wanted a huge selection of apps and a certain compatibility with other
people's machines. After going through 3 different incarnations of OS/2,
I have realized that Operating Systems/Environments work best with apps that
are designed specifically for them. Hence, just like DOS apps pretty much
stink under Windows, Windows apps don't work all that well under OS/2. After
a few weeks with OS/2 (in each different version--1.3, 2.0, 2.1), I finally
realized "What am I doing using OS/2 to run a bunch of Windows apps?" The
fact was that OS/2 really *wasn't* "a better Windows than Windows".
So for those who have special needs that OS/2's robustness fills,
I tip my hat to you--enjoy OS/2--especially if you have lots of OS/2 apps.
For everyone else--hey, when you push the edges of computing evolution,
you have to expect to blaze a trail. That means you have to scream a lot
for more apps and drivers. I just don't enjoy doing that, so I stay in
Windows, where the market over the past 3 years has dictated that most apps
will be developed and numerous devices and drivers too.
-----
Randy Whittle whittle@chaph.usc.edu
University of Southern California School of Business (Fight on, 'SC Trojans!)
- Motorcycle nut, HP 48GX & 100LX user, & lover of fine chocolate...
"It's not denial, I'm just very selective about the reality I accept!" -Calvin
"Consensus is the negation of leadership." - Margaret Thatcher