SPONSORED LINKS
In message Sun, 3 Jul 1994 14:30:47 -0500 (EST), "Adam Wilkinson" <adam@tiamat.umd.umich.edu> writes: > In message Fri, 1 Jul 1994 14:14:59 -0800 (PST), > "John Kim" <jokim@chs.cusd.claremont.edu> writes: >> Personally I think they should've stuck with MCA. I doubt they're >> selling *that* many docking stations, especially at the price they >> charge. > > Actually, machines based on the ISA achitecture are easier, faster and > cheaper to design and build, regardless of whether or not a docking > station is used. But since the 700 and 720 were *already* MCA, making the 750 MCA would've been a minor redesign, while making it ISA meant starting from scratch. (Something I have GOT to remember - never buy the first version after a complete redesign. I thought I'd learned my lesson after buying a first edition of a book but somehow I keep doing this - last time it was my car.) Oh well, it's ISA now and not much is going to change that. -- John H. Kim | "Just try telling the IRS you don't feel like jokim@jarthur.cs.hmc.edu | 'contributing' this year come April" - Bob Dole This mail sent by NUPop | on Bill Clinton's avoidance of the word "taxes"