[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PCMCIA Modems--28.8K info?
- To: sgross@enet.net
- Subject: Re: PCMCIA Modems--28.8K info?
- From: Randal Whittle <whittle@chaph.usc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 25 Dec 1994 13:30:26 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: TP750@cs.utk.edu (TP)
- In-Reply-To: <Chameleon.4.01.941225141139.sgross@.qrz.com> from "sgross@enet.net" at Dec 25, 94 02:07:47 pm
> I am using the Practical Peripherals PM288MT V.34 external modem.
>
> It is both V.34 and V.FC compliant.
>
> The US Robotics 28.8 Sportster V34 is the same.
>
> -steve
That's all well and good Steve--my US Robotics Courier
speaks both V.34 and V.FC quite nicely too.
But none of these modems are PCMCIA with an X-Jack connector!
That's what I'm trying to hunt down. Thanks for your input.
> ---------------Original Message---------------
> > > I was just looking in a catalog that came a few days ago
> > > and noticed that a lot of mfgrs. now have 28.8K PCMCIA modems for
> > > sale (either that, or the catalog is jumping the gun). They all said
> > > "V.34", so I presume they are V.34 only and no V.FC (too bad--I still
> > > have some 28.8K connections--especially the one here at USC--that are
> > > V.FC and not V.34).
> >
> > I'm sure that most v.34 modems are also compatible with V.FC. The ones
> > that use a Rockwell chipset certainly do, and any Manufacturers who came
> > out with V.FC modems will make sure that their V.34 modems are compatible
> > with V.FC.
> >
> > Josh Hosseinoff
> > hosseino@yu1.yu.edu
>
> Josh, I placed a call to Megahertz, and apparently they don't agree
> with you (at least with respect to their own modem).
>
> It is V.34 and does not have V.FC capability. Bummer...
----- ________________________________
Randy Whittle whittle@usc.edu | Y'know, Tuna just |
USC School of Business (Fight on, 'SC Trojans!)| doesn't taste the same |
(My opinions are mine, but since I'm | since they took the |
right, they should be yours too.) | Dolphin out! |
--------------------------------