SPONSORED LINKS
Thank you for your input, Lew!
At 11:45 AM 10/26/95, Lew Jansen wrote:
> Networking & the Briefcase "object"
Can you network to "old" Windows for Workgroups? (i.e., if I put
Win '95 on one machine and not the other, can they still talk to each
other?)
> Now, this is just why *I* put Win95 on both my systems; it offered some nice
>solutions for my specific needs. If you don't do any networking and are happy
>with what you have, I'm not sure there's a strong argument for upgrading now.
I have a desktop PC and a Macintosh networked together via 10Base-T
(I also have a 3Com card in my 'Pad). It runs Windows for Workgroups and
to connect the Mac, something called "MacLan Connect" (which basically
makes Windows speak Appletalk for the Mac's built-in networking). Between
that and some Windows drivers that speak to a hardware card that
communicates with my LaserJet 4 to produce 1200 dpi printing, I'm rather
reticent about upgrading to Win '95. I don't know if these things will get
along with the new Windows.
> Also -- I have 24 meg of RAM in my 755cx -- it'd probably be a bit different
>if I were at 8 meg or less. Win95's sweet spot seems to be at around 12 meg.
I have 12 MB RAM on my 750C--enough, you think?
----- ____________________________
Randy Whittle whittle@usc.edu | WWW Hope Page: |
USC Graduate School of Business (Fight on 'SC!)| http:// |
"Did you really think you could call up the | www-scf.usc.edu/~whittle/|
Devil and ask him to behave?" ----------------------------
-Fox Mulder on T.V.'s "X-Files" speaking to an occult practitioner