SPONSORED LINKS
Video out resolution is not too bad...slightly better than the 755cd. On a TV, you can probably get around 200 lines of resolution -- slightly worse than VHS. I haven't tried external 1024x768 video yet. I run Win3.1 and OS/2, both of which were pre-loaded on the 760cd. OS/2 performance is way better than on the 755cd, but I'm still probably going to uninstall it to make room on the HD. I plan to move to NT as soon as there is more support for it from IBM; NT is the only OS I use at work. One weird thing I've noticed is the sound of the 1.2 GB HD when it's reading/writing. It sometimes sounds like loose coins bouncing around in a washing machine. Very fast, however. I definitely don't like these speakers. The 755cd's are much louder and clearer. I don't much like this wrist rest either. Michael MacDonald macd@panix.com mmacdon1@tinker.hofstra.edu On 1 Dec 1995, Kenneth Yee/CAM/Lotus wrote: > > the water. It's much faster, the screen is significantly larger *and* > > brighter, and the special features (4x cdrom, mpeg, video in/out) are > > incredible. > Thanks for the quick review... > Is the resolution through video out crisp? Is the external video > out at 1024x768 fuzzy (the 755cx was)-: > And are you running anything unusual for an OS (Win95, NT, OS/2)? > > thanks, > > ken >