SPONSORED LINKS
different countries have different telecom standards. many are much tougher than the U.S. australia for example has a different set of specs than the U.S. some say its their monopoly (now duopoly) power to exact high payments from companies to run their devices through the telecom testing process. others say that some countries value their telephone linesmen (and women) more highly than is the case in the U.S. ... that here it is a matter of not wanting modems in the country that are capable of sending 240 volts up the telephone line at the technician working on the pole, if they don't have the appropriate cutouts. or, they don't want added line interference. i am sure someone can explain the techology better. personally i would think if you have a daa approved for australia or germany you'd be safe most anywhere. but i am not an electrical engineer, so i am not sure how valid that statement is. regards, al Alden S Klovdahl / alden.klovdahl@anu.edu.au / fax: +61 62 49 05 25 Sociology Arts / Australian National University / Canberra ACT Australia 0200 On Mon, 12 Aug 1996, Mikael Bendtsen wrote: > Hi all! > > I have a few ThinkPad users that are really travelling a lot. For > example to Japan, USA, Canada, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Germany and a > few more countries. Of course they want to read their mail when > they're on the road. > > The thing is, they're not very pleased with the built-in Mwave modem > since they need a new DAA Kit to almost every country. Not only > because it costs money, it costs time too. These kits can be very hard > to get, and to get in time. As you understand, it's not that good if > you get your Japanese DAA Kit the week after you left Japan. > > What did Mwave developers think of when they did it this way? Am I > missing something totally here? > > Best regards > -------------------------------------------- > Mikael Bendtsen > Responsor NWSM (Pharmacia & Upjohn) > Mikael.Bendtsen@eu.pnu.com - mike@se.ibm.com > >