SPONSORED LINKS
I thought MS did indeed include limited plug n play at the last minute in NT 4.0???? -Rick On Wed, 4 Sep 1996, Steve Hultquist wrote: > >>>>> "Mark" == Mark M Ingerman <ingerman@chelsea.ios.com> writes: > > Mark> With the recent announcement of NT 4.0 availability, I am pondering > Mark> installing NT 4.0 on my thinkpad ( certain applications I need won't run > Mark> under Win95 ). The only problem is that Microsoft seems to be back > Mark> peddleing on that availability of the notebook power support and the > Mark> plug and play support. > > There is no plug and play or APM in NT 4.0 (I'm running it as one of the two > OSs on my CX right now). There doesn't seem to be any NT 4.0 support for > Thinkpads, yet, either, and I don't know if the current NT utilities will run > under 4.0. Be forewarned that it takes more memory than 95, but it's also more > stable. > > Mark> Looks like Microsoft has done it again. I am caught between a rock and > Mark> a hard place. Any input would be appreciated. After all, I may be > Mark> missinterpreting the trade rags. I would be interested in hearing some > Mark> pros and cons on Win95 vs. NT 4.0 for Thinkpads. > > Run Linux (the other OS I run on my CX)? > > ssh >