[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows NT vs. 95
At 01:11 PM 9/5/96 -0400, Eugene Fiume wrote:
>Sorry for the naive and slightly off-topic question (my standard
>"I'm a UNIX bozo" apology). To what extent, if any, are commercial
>16 and 32 bit Windows '95 applications compliant with NT?
>
>Eugene Fiume.
I'm interested in seeing the response to this as well.
From what I understand, the very large part of 32-bit Made-for-Win95
apps almost all work just fine under Win NT. The exceptions I note are
certain thngs like Norton Utils (no under NT, but they now have a version
for NT out), which are the kind of thing that mess around at disk-level,
etc. But run of the mill software--I'm pretty sure it should work fine
under NT if it was designed to run under 95 (many times, the vendor designs
the software specifically to run on both--for instance, if you install
internet tools like Eudora or Netscape Navigator, the 95/NT install is one
and the same, while there's a different set of stuff installed if you're
running Win 3.x).
-------
Randy Whittle rwhittle@usa.net
USC Graduate School of Business http://www-scf.usc.edu/~whittle