[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thinkpads vs ?
> On Oct 12, 12:26pm, Alex Judd wrote:
> > Subject: Thinkpads vs ?
> > It is a sad day. After spending two years investing time and money
> > in to Thinkpads, my company has today decided that they will no longer
> > be using Thinkpad machines as our standard lap-top machine.
> >
> > Therefore I am now faced with trying to find a replacement machine
> > that has all the facilities and power of a TP760ED for our support
> > people, and the screen facilities and light weight of a TP560 for
> > our sales people.
> >
> > I know this is not the right place for this discussion, but I guess
> > everyone here must have weighed othermachines against the Thinkpads,
> > and have a fair idea what comes second best.
> >
> > Any advice much appreciated (please email me if you can).
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > Alex Judd
> >-- End of excerpt from Alex Judd
>
this is the perfect place for this kind of discussion because it helps to
highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the thinkpad line. if a few ibm
people subscribe discussion of weaknesses might lead to some improvement.
my thinkpad 755CE has been by and large a great machine, well worth its
price to me. support has been good, both locally and in terms of the ibm
ftp site. however, our software support person, to whom i have given a few
of the problems (like trying to deal with an infernal Jaz drive) keeps telling
me to get a toshiba or digital because they are more likely to follow
[ even if they may not set : - ) ] industry standards, and therefore there
is less need for support. but when i get a new machine, hopefully shortly, i
expect to pass the 755ce onto a programmer i work with, and expect a couple
of more years use from the mahine.
one thing i find offputting is the dribble dribble dribble approach of ibm to
its offerings. the 760 came out last november and what did it offer? a 12.1"
display and a movie clip. then over the next 3 or 4 months each previously
offered machine was superceded, bit by bit, dribble by dribble. no upgrade
path, no (i think) components that you could carry forward to your next
machine (eg, a large hdd), a cd-rom drive. this incremental approach really
encourages postponed decisions, or changes to machines for which you can say,
well at least i will have the damn thing for 6 months before it is superceded
by some feature i'd really like to have (such as a PCI bus in the case of the
first 760's).
i too am looking for discussions about new machines, of any brand.
regards, al
Alden S Klovdahl / alden.klovdahl@anu.edu.au / fax: +61 62 49 05 25
Sociology Arts / Australian National University / Canberra ACT Australia 0200