[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ibm 560
- To: thinkpad@cs.utk.edu
- Subject: Re: ibm 560
- From: jesse montrose <jesse@spine.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Oct 1996 18:22:21 -0700
- Comment: to {un}subscribe, send mail to thinkpad-REQUEST@cs.utk.edu
At 03:51 PM 10/19/96 -0700, Randy Whittle wrote:
>>> One group member said something about the 560 being made of
>>>different plastic than other tp's, and seeming less sturdy. Any comments
>
> The key word here would be "seeming"--yes, it *is* made of a
>different plastic that some of the other TP's, but the truth is its a
>*better* plastic! I *wish* I could remember what article I read, but it
>cited the exact material the TP 560 casing was made of and it was some new
>polymer (snazzy name--can't recall what it was!) that was both stronger and
>lighter. If anything, an argument could be made that the 560 just might
>have a *better* casing than the other ThinkPads.
>
> At ay rate, the case is *nothing* to worry about.
I'm the guilty group member, but I didn't mean to imply that it was more
breakable, just that I didn't like the feel, it was purely aesthetic, and
based on about 3 minutes with the machine :)
As another data point, I didn't like the feel of my 755, going from a 720.
_____________________________________________________
jesse montrose <jesse@spine.com> http://www.spine.com
After seven years, I was sent home to my family.
Little man, I give the watch to you.