SPONSORED LINKS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Problem with direct cable connection



Hi,

I got direct cable connection working last night between a PC and
my 701. In my case I didn't have the relevant protocol (Microsoft
IPX/SPX compatible) installed on both machines. Once I did that
it all worked (see Control panel, network). I used the shared
floppy/printer port on the ThinkPad - no port replicator.

have fun,

Andrew

----------
From: 	Maurice klein Gebbinck[SMTP:mauricek@cs.kun.nl]
Sent: 	Donnerstag, 24. Oktober 1996 08:00
To: 	thinkpad@cs.utk.edu
Cc: 	Stephen Mosley
Subject: 	Re: Problem with direct cable connection

Stephen Mosley wrote:
> 
> I am trying to connect a TP701C to a desktop PC using the Direct Cable
> connection feature in Windows 95. Has anyone ever gotten this to work? I
> would like to know.

You are in luck: I have experimented with the DCC last week and
succeeded
in establishing a connection. The problem is that there is an
IRQ-conflict
between the Audio System and the parallel port. A solution is to change
the IRQ of the Audio System, see
ftp://204.146.167.81/pub/pccbbs/corrective_service/wn95701.txt
<<File: wn95701.txt>>
For me this did the trick.

As someone on this list suggested, I tried setting the IRQ of the
floppy/parallel port (stand-alone) to #5. If I hold down f8 while
booting Win95 to go to DOS, the BIOS-configuration utility (?) shows
the port to have IRQ 5 (and EPP/378), just as selected. If I boot
Win95 all the way, the BIOS-configuration utility says the current
port setting is IRQ7/ECP/378, although there is no |> sign (indicating
that the setting was changed) in front of the IRQ5/EPP/378 setting in
the menu where you can alter it. I am wondering whether this is a
display error of the BIOS-configuration utility, or that by some
magic trick the setting of the port has changed. How is this possible?
Does anyone else have this as well? 

> The configuration I am trying is parallel port to parallel port via a
> standard laplink paralell cable.

Done it.

 I can't seem to get it to work after all
> the permutations and reconfigurations I could try, I think the problem is
> that the TP port replicator uses LPT2 but the printer port on the desktop
> is LPT1,

According to the standard settings on my computer the floppy/parallel
port has address 378 in stand-alone mode, and 278 in multiport mode.
The parallel port (multiport) has address 378. In Win95 LPT1 is set
at address 378, and LPT2 at 278. Conclusion: when the multiport is
attached, its parallel port is LPT1, and the floppy/parallel port is
LPT2.

but when I try to use the floppy drive port on the TP (with the
> parallel port converter attached) this doesn't work either.

In theorie, with the multiport attached you should be able to use
the floppy/parallel port for a connection on LPT2 without changing
the IRQ-settings. Have not tried it yet.

Hope this will help,

Maurice
-- 
Maurice klein Gebbinck <mauricek@cs.kun.nl>
University of Nijmegen, Computing Science Institute
Toernooiveld 1, 6525 ED Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Phone +31 24 3652710, Fax +31 24 3553450
http://www.cs.kun.nl/~mauricek