SPONSORED LINKS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Attachments




For what its worth, I think "large" attachments sent to the general list
are uncalled for.

But at the same time, reasonably-sized (i.e., small) ones shouldn't be a
big deal.  I for one was actually pleased to see the "TPIcons.dll" file,
and it was fairly small.

I'd hate to see a total "no-binaries" ban, as I think that is contrary to
the helpful nature of the list for small stuff.  At the same time, I'd
heartily support a "no BIG binaries" ban.

To me then, the remaining step would be to define "how big?"  Small files
that add only a few seconds to the download time of a mail packet shouldn't
be a big deal.  At the same time though, I'd object to a 500K file taking
up my download time when its something I'm not interested in anyway.

I'm sure there is a reasonable balance that would meet the desires of the
majority.


-------
Randy Whittle		rwhittle@usa.net
Marshall Graduate School of Business at USC    http://www-scf.usc.edu/~whittle

I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it 
is for or against. I'm a human being first and foremost, and as such I 
am for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole. - Malcolm X