SPONSORED LINKS
In a message dated 97-03-09 22:30:05 EST, you write: << Subj: Attachments Date: 97-03-09 22:30:05 EST From: rwhittle@usa.net (Randy Whittle) To: tp750@cs.utk.edu (TP List) For what its worth, I think "large" attachments sent to the general list are uncalled for. But at the same time, reasonably-sized (i.e., small) ones shouldn't be a big deal. I for one was actually pleased to see the "TPIcons.dll" file, and it was fairly small. I'd hate to see a total "no-binaries" ban, as I think that is contrary to the helpful nature of the list for small stuff. At the same time, I'd heartily support a "no BIG binaries" ban. To me then, the remaining step would be to define "how big?" Small files that add only a few seconds to the download time of a mail packet shouldn't be a big deal. At the same time though, I'd object to a 500K file taking up my download time when its something I'm not interested in anyway. I'm sure there is a reasonable balance that would meet the desires of the majority. >> I agree with Randy. I think that if someone has any spare time, to post up a README.1ST file to those who first subscribe to the list, stating rules about items such as downloads, flaming, etc. Paul Khoury