[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Subject: What laptops are for...
- To: thinkpad@cs.utk.edu
- Subject: Re: Subject: What laptops are for...
- From: stevez1 <stevez1@ibm.net>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jun 1997 22:23:42 -0400
- Comment: to {un}subscribe, send mail to thinkpad-REQUEST@cs.utk.edu
- References: <bulk.18869.19970601121508@CS.UTK.EDU>
- Reply-To: stevez1@ibm.net
> Subject: What laptops are for... was=>RE: CPU Upgrades - some real world numbers
> Date: Sat, 31 May 1997 12:48:32 -0500
> From: chessie@megsinet.net (Dennis Pantazis)
>
> I am a bit late on this thread....
>
> The most important issue to consider and keep in mind is what fundamentally
> a laptop is all about. Laptops are about MOBILE PRODUCTIVITY. IMNSHO...
> the TP701 & TP560, and as well the Compaq Armada and the Digital HighNote
> VP are significant achievements for they maintain the optimum form factor.
> The 701 was the first REAL player, but unfortunately IBM seems to have
> taken a lateral instead of going the distance with the 560. Compaq and
> Digital are playing catch up, and made pretty good units as well.
>
> All are essentially light in weight, hovering about 4 lb., have enough
> resources to do most work and are reasonable on batteries. Its really too
> bad that ZD is almost as big as Microsloth in editorial power. Their
> claims of a laptop having as much power as desktops, or at least that they
> are approaching that threshold is really unfortunate. The techno-newbies
> eat that crap up and with money burning a hole in their pockets drive the
> price of laptops up and their availability down. Laptops will NEVER
> approach the power or functionality of a desktop. If you are on a limited
> budget, and fully realize the limitations of a laptop, fine, great, you are
> on the ball. You get a cookie.
>
Laptops have approached the power or functionality of a desktop.
My current 760ED is much more powerful than my home PC, a Dell 486D/50,
and my
work PC a Dell 5133 (Pentium 133). Ofcourse, given the same amount of
money,
I can get a more powerful CURRENT model Desktop than a Laptop; and if I
need
the fastest Intel based PC available, it will not be in a Laptop model.
But then, a Laptop has features that the Desktop does not.
> If you find yourself running multiple apps and using a laptop like a
> desktop you are better off with a desktop. The premium for a laptop is
> almost twice the cost of a desktop or more, save your bread, buy a nice
> monitor and enjoy the comforts of a real chair. If you REALLY need to
> carry the CDROM AND FLOPPY and an EXTRA battery to keep these devils fed
> then somewhere you are doing something wrong. The days of the suitcase
> computers unfortunately dwindling. What a novel concept these days to
> stuff a desktop into a mobile case and have a real computer to carry and
> park for your presentation or investigation session. They might make a
> come back with the realized reality of bigger LCD screens.
>
I personally enjoy working on my 760ED, more than a desktop. Gives me a
lot
more room on my desk. But, most of all, I like the mobility, especially
at
home. I could work in my home office if I need the isolation, or in the
family
room if I want to be around the family. And, yes, I do work on trains
and
airplanes.
> I can't begin to tell you all how many people I see on the train playing
> freaking Solitare for their ride. Or better yet, using their CDROMS to
> play audio CD's. Man if you are toting around a $4k deck of cards or a
> really bad CD player, you probably have the quarter to buy a clue.
>
> As an engineer, for the most part, the most strenuous duty I would ever
> really expect my laptop to do is run video capture, data logging and
> PowerPoint type presentations. The rest is Word and Excel to get a jump on
> my day and make use of the hours that I spend commuting. Yes, I can run
> things like Autocad on the go, there were few occasions where it was
> 'handy' on my 701 but what a pain in the ass. I use little DOS
> engineering analysis applettes, but for the most part my 'tools' are
> spreadsheets and Mathematica workbooks on the go.
>
I generally use development tools (VB), databases (Access), accounting
software (QuickBooks), office productivity (Word, Excel), communications
(Internet stuff - IBM Dialer, Netscape, FreeAgent, Microsoft Explorer),
and
remote access (LapLink, CloseUp). Works very well on the 760ED.
> The laptop side of the computer industry is for the most part playing catch
> up with the desktop market and battery technology. It always has, it
> always will. You can not reasonably expect a laptop to really compete
> against a desktop plugged into the wall. Period! We might see a PPro in a
> laptop, or a Klamath, but you might as well save up for the Go-Go-Gadget
> Pocket Fusion Reactor to keep those buggers fed as well.
>
Battery life has never been a big deal for me. Most of the time, I plug
the
LapTop into the wall, since most locations that I work in do have
electricity.
And when traveling, the hour or two battery life is sufficient. If
necessary
I can always bring a second battery.
> My two bits
>
> Dennis
>
Just my humble opinion ...
Steven