SPONSORED LINKS
On Tue, 2 Sep 1997 17:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Annelise Anderson <andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu> writes: >Hi--I've got a 701 that's running dual-boot OS/2 and Windows 3.1, and >I'm think of replacing it with NT Workstation 4.0. The 701 has 16 >megs ram....think it will be okay? > Good luck. I'd rather stick with OS/2 and Win3.11. If you want reliability, stick with Warp 3.0 regular or connect. You could also put Win95 on the same partition with OS/2, dispite Micro$oft's stupid warnings. >I've got some favorite dos programs--ProComm, XyWrite--that I want to >be able to run; also Win95 software like Microsoft Office 7. I'd >appreciate your advice (I'm interested in getting acquainted with NT). DOS support is LOUSY compared to OS/2 or Win95, but it still runs. Some Windows 3.x apps may not work though. I was not thouroughly pleased with NT 4.0 on my server, which is a P75 with 16MB of RAM. Later, Paul > >Annelise > >P.S. The welcome message for this list says that there's a ThinkPad >500 list a virginia.edu--that list has been moved, and it's now on >my computer (about 200 subscribers). To subscribe send mail to >majordomo@andrsn.stanford.edu with the body message >subscribe tp-500 <your e-mail address> >Messages to the list would go to tp-500@andrsn.stanford.edu. > >I'd appreciate it if the list owner would change the welcome message, >as subscriptions sent to virginia.edu get forwarded to me and I have >to handle them by hand. > >