SPONSORED LINKS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Thinkpad upgrades



On Fri, 17 Oct 1997, Robert Munzenrider wrote:

> Everything Steve says about upgrading seems upgrading accurate, but
> still....   I have a 2-year-old TP701 (Butterfly model) with a SLOWWW
> 486/75 processor.  Evergreen Tech will install an AMD P5 chip (I forget the
> model specs) for $400. The AMD chip is rated at 133 mhz, but they say that
> the effective speed is equivalent to a Pentium 75.   With Win95 & Office97
> in my machine now, I'm "seeing" slow operating speed, especially when
> multi-tasking - even with 24 megs of RAM.

  It is a AMD 5x86-133.  The whole P5 numbering scheme is meant to confuse
and mislead buyers.

> I don't have $1500-2500 or more to buy a new system, but I might could
> maybe squeeze out $400 for the cpu upgrade.  The 701 seems in fine shape &
> should have a couple more years of life in it.  Maybe more with a cpu
> upgrade.   Although my upgraded system would not be the
> latest/greatest/fastest around, would I pick up enough "Bang for the Buck"
> to make the upgrade worthwhile??

  Ok, you are really asking "is it worth $400 to go from a '486-75 to a
'486-100."  Lets look at this realistically.  First, the CPU cores are
basically the same on a clock for clock basis.  Second, you are only
increasing the clock by 33%.  Third, you have no L2 cache to help off-set
the effects of the slow 25MHz memory bus.  Fourth, both CPU's have a 16K
L1 cache.  So realistically, since all the variables are basically staying
the same except the switch from a 3x multiplier to a 4x multiplier I
highly doubt you'll get anywhere near 20% more CPU speed out of it.  To be
quite honest you can measure 20% on benchmarks, but you can barely feel
the difference when using a system.

  My recommendation:
Live with it for a while longer, then sell it and take the money you saved
on upgrading it by very small increments and buy something significantly
better.  20% more speed [at best] is nothing.  It it is too slow now it
will still be too slow after you spent $400 on it.  Please, if anyone has
true performance increase numbers for this upgrade [measured via a
reliable benchmark like Winbench] please share them with us.

  Re-installing Win95, defragging your hard drive frequently and getting
a good memory manager like QEMM will probably get you more speed for far
less money.

  If you ever want to sell that TP701 [is it a c or cs?] for a decent
price let me know. I always thought they were pretty cool and almost
bought one.  I ended up getting a TP560 instead.  =)

  Without knowing your system configuration, a used TP701 is worth around
$500-$800.  You can take that, plus your $400 for the upgrade and get into
a P100 with 256K L2 cache [ref: Sharp 3040 a friend bought at Damark a
while back] for ~$1000 and run 2-3 times faster.  It's not as cool as the
TP701 and only has a 12.1" DS display, but that ought to give you some
idea of what can be had for $1000-$1500.

============================================================================
==== Steve Parker ==== San Luis Obispo, CA ==== Multi-OS & Multitasking ====
============================================================================