Re: Evergreen 701C upgrade results

To: "David Ross" <ross@math.hawaii.edu>, "Eric Giles" <egiles@netpathway.com>
Subject: Re: Evergreen 701C upgrade results
From: "Paul Khoury" <pkhoury@loop.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 97 06:59:46
Cc: "thinkpad@cs.utk.edu" <thinkpad@cs.utk.edu>
Comment: to {un}subscribe, send mail to thinkpad-REQUEST@cs.utk.edu
Priority: Normal
Reply-To: "Paul Khoury" <pkhoury@loop.com>

On Wed, 22 Oct 97 19:32:43 HST, David Ross wrote:
>> tests, then upgraded to processor to a 586 (133MHz, at least that is what
>> they claim). Here are Evergreen's results:
>
>Well, we all know that this is false.
>
>David R.
>
>
It's interesting how something can appear so desirable, something
that makes our machines faster, and it turns out that the truth was bent.

How deceptive!

Paul

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Evergreen 701C upgrade results
  - From: ross@math.hawaii.edu (David Ross)

Prev by Date: Re: Evergreen 701C upgrade results
Next by Date: Birth Announcement
Prev by thread: Re: Evergreen 701C upgrade results
Next by thread: Re: Evergreen 701C upgrade results
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread