[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
TP 701 Upgrade by PEP
- To: TP List <tp750@cs.utk.edu>
- Subject: TP 701 Upgrade by PEP
- From: Randal Whittle <rwhittle@usa.net>
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 16:25:38 -0800
- Comment: to {un}subscribe, send mail to thinkpad-REQUEST@cs.utk.edu
Attention all 701 "Butterfly" owners:
Emanuel Brown and I have worked out an arrangement with PEP where they will
do this CPU upgrade on my 701C machine (currently a 486/75 machine with the
720 MB HD and a 16 MB RAM module installed) for a nominal cost.
The deal is that I am to run the various "real world" tests & benchmarks on
the upgrade machine and report to everyone on the list (and I presume Mr.
Brown will report it on his web page as well) for your consumption--so you
can see whether the CPU upgrade delivers the significant speed increase
that makes it worth your while to pay for the upgrade or not.
Now here's the problem that needs to be solved: What suite of "tests" do
you want me to run? I would like to see a consensus among the 701 users
about what constitutes a fair & unbiased test suite that would give you the
information necessary to make a judgement about whether PEP's CPU upgrade
delivers the goods or not.
Until we have that consensus, there is no point to my taking up PEP's time
and money to do this--you have to be "on board" as it were, concerning the
fairness and accuracy of the tests' results in the real world. I offer my
own skeptical and unbiased independence in performing them, but I await
your collective decision regarding *what* tests should be run.
Ideally, I want this settled so I can run the tests on the current "stock"
machine before I send it in for the upgrade--so you have a true "before &
after" set of test results.
I await your decision...
-------
Randal J. Whittle whittle@usc.edu (213) 740-7775
Director, Electronic Commerce Program
Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California