SPONSORED LINKS
At 12:21 PM 1/4/98 -0500, Robert Munzenrider wrote: >Perhaps the variation is due to my using Norton version 3.0. One other >possibility comes to mind: do you have a 701/50mhz? No. Almost identical specs as you had--75 MHz, 24 MB RAM, etc. >Now that you mention it, I do dimly recall something in the Norton >documentation about how the benchmarks aren't comparable across Norton >version.???? Something such. Unfortunately, mine was a "Borrowed" version >of Norton and I don't have the docs..., but it is the 3.0 version... > >I'll be curious what kind of ratings you'll get with Norton 3.0 3.0 for Windows 95, or the DOS version? ------- Randal J. Whittle whittle@usc.edu (213) 740-7775 Director, Electronic Commerce Program Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California