SPONSORED LINKS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 770 price cut

To: Paul Rubin <phr@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: 770 price cut
From: Lee Hetherington <ilh@sls.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 1998 08:01:00 -0500
Cc: pkhoury@loop.com, thinkpad@cs.utk.edu
Comment: to {un}subscribe, send mail to thinkpad-REQUEST@cs.utk.edu
Organization: MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, Spoken Language Systems
References: <199802080612.WAA28970@netcom11.netcom.com>

Personally, I feel that the 14.1" screen on my 770 is as large a screen
as I'd want to lug around.  The 770's footprint is pretty much as small
as possible considering the screen size.  Any larger and the footprint
would get even bigger, and the 770 already has a large footprint.
Besides, I can't see the point of going larger than 14.1" with 1024x768.

--Lee Hetherington

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 770 price cut
  - From: epbrown@enteract.com (epbrown)

References:
- Re: 770 price cut
  - From: Paul Rubin <phr@netcom.com>

Prev by Date: Re: changing network settings
Next by Date: Re: 770 price cut
Prev by thread: Re: 770 price cut
Next by thread: Re: 770 price cut
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread