SPONSORED LINKS
On Sat, 04 Apr 1998 07:49:26 -0800, Randal Whittle <rwhittle@usa.net> wrote: >At 07:16 AM 4/4/98 , richard wrote: >>The 600 is only about 15% faster than the 560 (PCMag benchmarks). While >it has > > 15% is peanuts. If it were 50% faster, you'd start into the realm of >significance. You wouldn't even notice 15%... Not to be defensive, but that's what I meant by "only". I'm hoping that the speed difference between the 560 and 560x is readily apparent. >>a larger, higher resolution screen, it weighs about a pound more and the >battery > > You missed something here--the 600 weighs 6 1/2 lbs, while the 560 is 4.1 >lbs. That's not merely a pound, that's almost 2 1/2 pounds. Definitely >not insignificant (at least ot me!). That's a *huge* difference. PCMag lists the 600 as 5.6 lbs system weight and 6.5 lbs travel weight