SPONSORED LINKS
On Tue, 07 Apr 1998 09:40:22 -0700, Randal Whittle wrote: >At 08:39 AM 4/7/98 , Robert Dewar wrote: >><< If the sender *chooses* to send it in a form that fewer people >can read, >>that's his choice. He should do so knowing in advance that it won't be >>universally readable, but that shouldn't prevent him from sending it. > >>Well sure it is the sender's choice, but it is annoying to readers. This > > To some. But think about it--why? We all have something that annoys us. >There's *plenty* of topics on this list that hold no interest at all for >me--I delete them and move on. Why is this formatting issue any different >than that? Delete it and move on. There's no reason why it should bother >you. I read everything I get anyways, so it would be better if you could make it readable. I keep everything anyways, unless it's garbage like that. -- Paul Khoury <pkhoury@loop.com> http://pkhoury.dyn.ml.org Sent from my ThinkPad 701CS running OS/2 Warp 4.0, Fixpack 5 There are 22 Processes with 89 Threads. This machine's uptime is 0d 3h 25m 2s 570ms.