SPONSORED LINKS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [List Maint] Non-Text postings



On Tue, 7 Apr 98 21:26 CEST, Harald Milz wrote:

>> >From: 	Randal Whittle[SMTP:rwhittle@usa.net]
>> >Sent: 	Tuesday, April 07, 1998 1:29 AM
>> >To: 	Paul Khoury
>> >Cc: 	LPLarsen; ThinkPad List
>> >Subject: 	Re: Fw: Classifieds2000 found 5 computers
>> >
>> >At 11:11 PM 4/6/98 , Paul Khoury wrote:
>> >>The next time you send attachments, can you please make them readable?
>> >>I cannot read them, and they appear as AT0000x.ATT (x being 1 and up).
>> >
>> >	Actually Paul, his "attachment" was really just an in-line HTML mail.
>> >Some mail readers (notably Netscape's & Eudora 4.0) read this just fine,
>> >but other mailers (I note that you are using PMMail for OS/2), not knowing
>> >how to show the mailing, just handle it as an attachment.
>
>Randal,
>
>Netscape & Eudora & posting HTML crap in mailing lists and newsgroups is
>definitely not the common denominator. In the past, using the common
>denominator used to be a standard adhered to by about everybody on the
>Internet. Adherance to netiquette appears to become unpopular these days. 
>
>> >	For those of us using a more capable mailer (Grin!), it came through
>> >perfectly fine and looked pretty darn good to boot--basically it was a web
>> >page in my E-Mail.
>
>Go post URLs instead. Your so-called more capable mailer will interpret the
>URL fine so you can go and click on it. Folks with "less capable mailers"
>can copy & paste the URL to their favourite browser. And hey, you really
>don't need to send the high volume traffic to everybody. There are people
>out there who pay their ISP per volume. The choice what they suck down
>their lines is up to them, not up to you. 
>
>
I agree, especially for those like myself with little bandwidth as it is (9600 bps, and 14.4kbps).

And I can click on a URL and go directly to Netscape, but not in one of those goofy attachments.



-- 
Paul Khoury   <pkhoury@loop.com>  http://pkhoury.dyn.ml.org
Sent from my ThinkPad 701CS running OS/2 Warp 4.0, Fixpack 5
There are 22 Processes with 88 Threads.
This machine's uptime is 0d 9h 15m 23s 625ms.