[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TFT weight (was: Re: I think I'm going to defect...)
On Tue, 07 Apr 98 22:30:08 -0800, Paul Khoury wrote:
>On Sun, 5 Apr 1998 22:41:42 -1000, David Ross wrote:
>
>>>> Also--I'm curious: Do TFT displays weigh a significant amount? Enough to
>>>Glass, metal, plastic, and the circuit boards. TFT's have more circuitry
>>because they're
>>>all digital, whereas DSTN and STN would be more analog (AFAIK).
>>
>>
>>I don't think that DSTN is any more analog than TFT, and the extra circuitry
>>in the latter would consist of a handful of chips, hardly a major
>>weight-producer.
>>
>DSTN constantly refreshes the display, typical of analog displays.
>
>TFT uses transistors for the pixels, and is more digital.
>
>And I know that the chips are very few, but ironically, the specs on raw
>LCDs show TFT to be lighter than DSTN (I was going to buy a TFT for my
>server, but got a STN for my field work instead).
>
>>>If you think that's heavy, my SPARCbook is supposed to weigh 7.5 lbs, I'm
>>
>>I have a Micron which is heavier, but don't consider it a 'laptop':-)
>>
>This has NO floppy nor CD-ROM (a 595/495 option, respecitvely), but it
>at least has ISDN, the IBM Trackpoint (same Lexmark keyboard, minus the Fn
>key), and 10BaseT. Considering I have to haul around an external CD-ROM,
>it's HEAVY!
>
>>>I guess it depends on what you're used to. I used to lug around my original
>>IBM PC around when that
>>
>>
>>I can match that - try cross-country skiing across a frozen lake with a
>>Morrow MicroDecision (CP/M, circa 1981) strapped to your back!
>>
>When I went cross-country sking, I only had my HP Omnigo straped to my
>back <g> (Geoworks, circa 1997). It's roughtly the size of a 3.5" IDE HD. In fact,
>it's exactly the size. I also brought my ThinkPad, but I left it in my room (only I and the
>vice principal brought notebooks; it was
>a school trip).
>
>Okay, back to ThinkPad stuff...
>
>--
>Paul Khoury <pkhoury@loop.com> http://pkhoury.dyn.ml.org
>Sent from my P75 Server running OS/2 Warp 4.0, Fixpack 6
>There are 27 Processes with 93 Threads.
>This machine's uptime is 3d 9h 35m 54s 531ms.
>
>
>--
>Paul Khoury <pkhoury@loop.com> http://pkhoury.dyn.ml.org
>Sent from my P75 Server running OS/2 Warp 4.0, Fixpack 6
>There are 27 Processes with 98 Threads.
>This machine's uptime is 4d 9h 25m 13s 531ms.
>
--
Paul Khoury <pkhoury@loop.com> http://pkhoury.dyn.ml.org
Sent from my ThinkPad 701CS running OS/2 Warp 4.0, Fixpack 5
There are 22 Processes with 87 Threads.
This machine's uptime is 0d 1h 23m 21s 382ms.