SPONSORED LINKS
On Mon, 20 Apr 1998 20:19:37 +0100 (BST), A.F.Hewlett wrote: > > >On Sun, 19 Apr 1998, Paul Khoury wrote: > >> I also heard that Windows 95 doesn't support commas in filenames, which could >> be a problem, because some filenames are at least over 50 chars. WITH LOTS of >> commas. Can anyone confirm this? > >I can confirm that it's not the case - the following filename worked ok: > >This is an extremely long filename... let us see if it works! (Test for >Paul, from Thinkpad list) Okay, that's good. A sample file name is: thinkpad_350,350C-J0A,L0A,N0A,P0A_physical_environmental_misc.html So this would be okay in Windows? UNIX supports commas, right? At least, it better! -- Paul Khoury | <pkhoury@loop.com> | Sent from my ThinkPad 701CS Proudly running OS/2 Warp 3/4, Slackware Linux, and Sun Solaris 2.4