Re: [TP600] Weight again (was: [Fwd: Re: Compare Thinkpad 600 / 770])

To: "David Ross" <ross@math.hawaii.edu>
Subject: Re: [TP600] Weight again (was: [Fwd: Re: Compare Thinkpad 600 / 770])
From: "Aaron W. Brown" <aaron@designcraft.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 20:21:05 -0500
Cc: "TP List" <tp750@cs.utk.edu>
Comment: to {un}subscribe, send mail to thinkpad-REQUEST@cs.utk.edu
Reply-To: "Aaron W. Brown" <aaron@designcraft.com>

David said:
>You didn't mention sturdiness - the 560 *is* a bit flimsy (snip)

Maybe another difference between the TP600 and TP770?

On the ibm website the TP600 memory description says:
SDRAM/3.3v/66MHz/non-parity; two sockets for two JEDEC 144-pin SDRAM
SO-DIMMs


TP770 says:
SDRAM/3.3v/83 or 100MHz/non-parity; two sockets for two JEDEC 144-pin EDO or
SDRAM SO-DIMMs (EDO is not supported on models 5AU/51U/52U/53U).

Why is faster memory required on the 770?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TP600] Weight again (was: [Fwd: Re: Compare Thinkpad 600 / 770])
  - From: Randal Whittle <rwhittle@usa.net>
- Re: [TP600] Weight again (was: [Fwd: Re: Compare Thinkpad 600 / 770])
  - From: I Lee Hetherington <ilh@sls.lcs.mit.edu>

Prev by Date: Genovation Parallel Keypad II model 650
Next by Date: repairing or disposing of batteries
Prev by thread: Re: [TP600] Weight again (was: [Fwd: Re: Compare Thinkpad 600 / 770])
Next by thread: Re: [TP600] Weight again (was: [Fwd: Re: Compare Thinkpad 600 / 770])
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread