SPONSORED LINKS
what is the difference between Trident and NeoMagic..?? lruby On Thu, 07 May 98 12:20:58 Paul Khoury <pkhoury@loop.com> wrote: > On Thu, 7 May 1998 09:04:26 -0600 (MDT), raybay wrote: > > >Well IBM has always done a great job on building computers and a lousy job > >on documentation and support... luckily their machines have been constructed > >so well that the documentation and support have not been big issues... > > This is very true of both their systems and operating systems. > > >People used to IBM's have not experienced some of the horrors owners of > >other equipment have struggled to correct. > > > I am used to my machines, because I find all this stuff more than easy. Everyone > else's mileage will vary because of different skill levels. > > >I am one of those people who has always had BIG trouble with various products > >manufactured by Trident, so I looked forward to the NeoMagic. The research > >and development in graphics and graphics chips are truly exciting... I expect > >a big change at IBM and others before Christmas. > > > Well, I also hear the Trident really sucks at OS/2 support, so I'm not surprised if they're lacking in other fields. > > -- > Paul Khoury | <pkhoury@loop.com> | Sent from my ThinkPad 701CS > The ThinkPad Assistant HTML can be accessed through links from http://pkhoury.dyn.ml.org > Proudly running OS/2 2.1, OS/2 Warp 3/4 and Sun Solaris 2.4 > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- Lestari, Ruby Vanderbilt University Email: ruby.lestari@Vanderbilt.Edu