SPONSORED LINKS
On Fri, 15 May 1998 02:11:18 -0400 (EDT), Chris Hanson wrote: > From: "Paul Khoury" <pkhoury@loop.com> > Date: Thu, 14 May 98 22:55:54 > > > >The cable is standard, but as far as I know no one has ever gotten the > >Dock I SCSI to work under Linux. > > > Isn't it just a Trantor chipset (now owned by Adaptec)? > >According to "http://peipa.essex.ac.uk/tp-linux/tp-linux.html" it is a >TMC-950, which as far as I know is a Future Domain chipset. Is that a >Trantor? I'm not sure what a Trantor is. > Trantor used to be a company that made SCSI chipsets. They're just like Future Domain, Adaptec, NCR/Symbios, Buslogic, etc. I goofed though, maybe it was the Dock II with Trantor SCSI. >Prior to today, I've never spoken to anyone who had managed to get it >to work, even following the instructions on that Web page. > >This is in contrast to the Dock II, which works well. > >And for the record: I stupidly mis-spoke regarding the SCSI connector. >For some reason, even though I was perfectly aware that we were >talking about the Dock I, my statement was based on the Dock II. >(I've never even _seen_ a Dock I.) My brain must have been >under-caffeinated when I wrote that. > I can't remember what it looks like either, but the Dock II is so much better than the Dock I, though. Now if only I had one... -- Paul Khoury | <pkhoury@loop.com> | Sent from my ThinkPad 701CS The ThinkPad Assistant HTML can be accessed through links from http://pkhoury.dyn.ml.org Proudly running OS/2 2.1, OS/2 Warp 3/4 and Sun Solaris 2.4