SPONSORED LINKS
I wrote: >I think this was a nice >way of describing the IBM website, though occasionally they also are not > precise (especially when describing weights and sizes of options). James wrote: > >What I was saying is that IBM can provide information which looks like >it is correct, is not. Yes, I understood this as your meaning, and entirely agree - I think this is consistent with my numerical analogy. However, it is *also* the case that IBM occasionally provides information such as "Weight: less than one pound" - which is *not* precise, though perhaps accurate! David A. Ross ross@math.hawaii.edu www.math.hawaii.edu/~ross