SPONSORED LINKS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2.88 fdd



In message Mon, 28 Mar 94 09:32:26 -0500,
  dewar@SCHONBERG.CS.NYU.EDU (Robert Dewar)  writes:

> just to repeat my experience. I did not encounter any problems reading
> bogus 2.88's that had been formatted and written on the same TP. However,
> I definitely DID have problems trying to transfer such diskettes between
> machines (I have a 2.88 TEAC drive on my desktop machine).

On a related note, has anybody else had problems reading 1.44 MB diskettes
that work just fine with desktop 1.44 MB drives?
--
John H. Kim              | "Just try telling the IRS you don't feel like
jokim@jarthur.cs.hmc.edu | 'contributing' this year come April" - Bob Dole
This mail sent by NUPop  | on Bill Clinton's avoidance of the word "taxes"