[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ADMIN: Its time to rethink putting this list on Usenet..
On Thu, 15 Dec 1994, Keith Moore wrote:
> > I think this group has out grown the mailing list. It time to reconsider
> > starting a group on usenet.... I woudl probably have to unsubscribe
> > soon because of the traffic and the fact that my 750C is stable and the
> > clutter in my inbox outways the benefits... If this group would exist as
> > a usenet group, I wouls visit it once a week or so, glance over, read
> > what I think I want to, respond, and done...
>
> I always find it odd when people complain about the volume here, and
> the proposed solution is to move the discussion to usenet. Doing so
> will surely not decrease the volume, and will surely increase the
> noise-to-signal ratio!
I agree! comp.sys.laptops gets cross-posted with all kinds of junk!
Something that doesn't happen with E-Mail
[snip]
> 3. A 'digest' list (separate from the main one) which lumps
> articles together in batches which are periodically sent out.
An excellent suggestion! Another list I'm on offers a daily digest option
- you can choose to receive the messages individually, or a single daily
mailig containing ALL traffic that day. Advantage: you now have just one
message to browse when you have time. Disadvantage: it's tough if you
wish to reply to a particular message, as they are no longer distinct in
your reader.
> 4. A www browsable archive of the list, that anyone on the Internet
> could peruse at his or her leisure. (so you don't actually have
> to subscribe to the list to keep up)
Also a good idea - a long-term resource available to the entire Net!
> I'd be willing to invest my copious free time in any (perhaps
> multiple) of these approaches.
Keith - I think you'll find several folks (me included, if I can find time
<g>) who'll help with administration tasks once the tech stuff is handled.
[snip]
> #3 is not too difficult to do here, and if lots of people want it I
> will start working on it in earnest.
>
> #4 would only help people with good tcp/ip access. it would be very
> useful...but it might not quite fit people's needs in this case. I
> suspect tools for the web server already exist, it's just a matter of
> finding them and getting the disk space...
>
> Keith
>
--
Adam Lee Wilkinson * Just remember, no matter where you go,
adam@tiamat.umd.umich.edu * there you are!
Compuserve: 75470,71 * - Buckaroo Bonzai