SPONSORED LINKS
Item Subject: Message text >>Your performance numbers are not that >>much of a suprise given that you ran >>OS/2 on a stacked FAT partition. I *have* run it on a stacked FAT partition. This I found to be too slow to tolerate. Recently, I have been running, like you, with a complete HPFS system. Without compression, though, it's been hard to find disk space on my little 170MB hard drive. >>I run OS/2 >>on my thinkpad and have set it up with an HPFS >>partition. Performance if VERY much faster than >>running under FAT. I agree. Wesley Dunaway