SPONSORED LINKS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 560 performance




On Thu, 29 Aug 1996, Randy Whittle wrote:

>         Why is it, I wonder, that caches are skimped on so regularly in
> Notebooks?  My 701 has a 16 KB cache.  Even a *small* cache is better than none!

And, in fact, a small cache is usually as good as a big one. The jump in
hit rates is usually pretty slender when you move to a larger cache.