SPONSORED LINKS
On Fri, 6 Sep 1996, Robert Dewar wrote: > Rather than a folding screen, which is hard to imagine would not have a > break anyway at the fold, multiple screens that folded out would be fine, Wasn't there some U.S. company working on flexible LCDs? > (*) the fonts that come standard with win 95 are much worse than the OS/2 > fonts. The true type fonts are simply terrible at small sizes, and the > number of bit-mapped fonts is disappointing, e.g. there is no 10 x 6 I've noticed this problem too. I can work for hours with the 8x6 fonts I use with Linux and X, but I get eyestrain after a couple hours of the 10xsomething font I have for Win95. Does anyone know of some good small bitmapped fonts? Does Adobe Type Manager do any better? -- John H. Kim jokim@mit.edu