SPONSORED LINKS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: defense of xjacks (was Re: ethernet/modem combo, thanks and summary)



At 04:59 PM 12/8/96 -0800, Jesse Montrose wrote:

>>It uses a dongle.  I don't like the XJacks -- I was always fearful it
>>would break.  Different strokes . . .
>
>Just an anecdotal reference, I've had two xjack modems (a 14.4 and a 28.8)
>and have never had the xjack break (I have broken a couple dongles).

>BTW, both of these were megahertz, can't say about the others.

	I'd have to second that to some extent, and add that I *have* had another
X-Jack "Clone" made by Practical Peripherals--man, was that thing a LEMON!
It never could stay in--nothing but problems.

	But as for the Megahertz "originals" (they invented it & own the patent),
the MHz I have right now with X-Jack works wonderfully with no
problems--and its taken a bit of abuse too.

	Alas, it was a little hairy to use with my 701 (fold-out keyboard), but
functional, and on the 560 I have to make sure I use the "upper" slot--the
bottom slot doesn't work because the computer is so darn *thin* that the
bottom part of the RJ-11 plug hits the table before it can lock into place
in the X-Jack!


-------
Randy Whittle		rwhittle@usa.net
USC Graduate School of Business    http://www-scf.usc.edu/~whittle

I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it 
is for or against. I'm a human being first and foremost, and as such I 
am for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole. - Malcolm X