[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: defense of xjacks (was Re: ethernet/modem combo, thanks and summary)
- To: Jesse Montrose <jesse@spine.com>
- Subject: Re: defense of xjacks (was Re: ethernet/modem combo, thanks and summary)
- From: Randy Whittle <whittle@usc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 08 Dec 1996 17:14:42 -0800
- Cc: thinkpad@cs.utk.edu
- Comment: to {un}subscribe, send mail to thinkpad-REQUEST@cs.utk.edu
At 04:59 PM 12/8/96 -0800, Jesse Montrose wrote:
>>It uses a dongle. I don't like the XJacks -- I was always fearful it
>>would break. Different strokes . . .
>
>Just an anecdotal reference, I've had two xjack modems (a 14.4 and a 28.8)
>and have never had the xjack break (I have broken a couple dongles).
>BTW, both of these were megahertz, can't say about the others.
I'd have to second that to some extent, and add that I *have* had another
X-Jack "Clone" made by Practical Peripherals--man, was that thing a LEMON!
It never could stay in--nothing but problems.
But as for the Megahertz "originals" (they invented it & own the patent),
the MHz I have right now with X-Jack works wonderfully with no
problems--and its taken a bit of abuse too.
Alas, it was a little hairy to use with my 701 (fold-out keyboard), but
functional, and on the 560 I have to make sure I use the "upper" slot--the
bottom slot doesn't work because the computer is so darn *thin* that the
bottom part of the RJ-11 plug hits the table before it can lock into place
in the X-Jack!
-------
Randy Whittle rwhittle@usa.net
USC Graduate School of Business http://www-scf.usc.edu/~whittle
I'm for truth, no matter who tells it. I'm for justice, no matter who it
is for or against. I'm a human being first and foremost, and as such I
am for whoever and whatever benefits humanity as a whole. - Malcolm X