SPONSORED LINKS
Hmmm, no repsonses yet. Usually, these modem threads start with me claiming how much success I've had with the modem simply using: at&f1&c1&k3 by going into the registry and editing the default settings for the modem. (I also change the hangup string to a simple ATH). Then other people come on and say stuff like "Big deal, that would work on any modem" or "That's redundant, 'cause the f1 sets to factory default and the c1&k3 alter the compression settings to the same thing as the defaults, so at&f1 would be just as good..." Then would come the serious string tweakers, talking about line noise, compression schemes, start and stop bits, UART chips, S-registers and so on, and before long folks are delving into the fact that modem is a contraction of MODblahblah EMublah, and bandwidth, and T1s and T3s, and fiber optic technology, and I'd sort of tune the thread out until it died from there. But I still use the above string! epbrown On Fri, 31 Jan 1997 20:53:40 -0800 (PST), you wrote: »On Fri, 31 Jan 1997, Dennis Pantazis wrote: » »> Now, I can not find the internal 14.4 modem discussion that I saved about »> tweaking the internal modem's performance. »> »> Could someone please post or privatley email the synopsis or the command »> sting that was trown around? » »Others of us have found the 701 modem flaky. I'd appreciate tips »going to the list. » » » epbrown@enteract.com Laptop Central, home of the Portable Computing FAQ http://www.enteract.com/~epbrown