SPONSORED LINKS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Win95 & Thinkpads



If your display is a 800x600 then all dos s/w will use only 640x480
of the pixels. Unlike a CRT display that use a scanning gun, a LCD
has 800 pixles across & 600 pixels down. Dos can only sctivate
640x480 of them.

There should be a option for screen expansion in the TP features
under display that may provide you with expantion 

You might want to think of it as a feature of Microsoft, they are the
one who wrote DOS.

On Thu, 17 Apr 1997 18:32:06 -0400, P. van Schijndel wrote:

>I have a 365XD.  When I run a MS-DOS application, it runs in a partial
>screen mode (see below), even if I set the property to full screen.  The
>image is there, just shrunk to a window size, with a black border all
>around it in full screen mode.
>
>Anybody know why?  Anybody have a solution.
>
>Here is an excerpt from a post I sent to
>microsoft.public.win95.msdosapps, and a response.  Do you agree with the
>response?
>
>----forward----
>
>This sounds like a problem (feature?) of the Thinkpad computer. Due to
>the
>nature of the LCD displays in notebooks, some DOS programs that require
>unusual resolutions cannot utilize the full LCD screen.
>
>Adam
>
>P. van Schijndel <pvanschi@sprynet.com> wrote in article
><3353F066.3849@sprynet.com>...
>> I have a IBM Thinkpad 365XD running Win95.  
>> 
>> When I run DOS apps in full screen mode (that is, not windowed), the
>> image does not fill the entire screen.  It fills the centre half (like a
>> doughnut, where the image is the "doughnut" hole.
>> 
>> Even after setting the properties of the application -- not a shortcut
>> -- to full screen, this effect still occurs.
>> 
>> Has anyone else had this problem?
>>

jeffsnc@mindspring.com

I'm not paranoid, I know they are following me.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Unsolicited advertising sent to this E-Mail address is expressly prohibited 
under USC Title 47, Section 227.  Violators are subject to charge of up to 
$1,500 per incident or treble actual costs, whichever is greater.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -