SPONSORED LINKS
How did you get them all in the same partition? Or do you mean all booting as "C:" ---------- From: Paul Khoury[SMTP:pkhoury@earthlink.net] Sent: 1997 August 19 - Tuesday 18:57 To: jeff kiyoi; thinkpad@cs.utk.edu Subject: Re: 755cx OS upgrade (or I H8 EZ SERV) On Tue, 19 Aug 1997 15:39:35 -0500, jeff kiyoi wrote: >Hi all. Well, the EZ Serve techs and I are on a first name basis now. >This is >my third time in for service in the last month. By my counts, my >machine has >been looked at by between seven and twelve different technicians at EZ >serv including two separate "quality" assurance teams. I have had the >system board and the processor card replaced, and been told on at least >six separate occasions that my mouse and crash problems are all due to >bad >software. Finally, on the third time its been in, after registering >complaints >twice, I was able to have the head tech on 755 models check out my >machine >and lo and behold- its a bad hard drive! So my troubles are over, >right? >No. It seems that IBM refuses to do anything but load my new drive with > >factory specs, meaning win 3.1 and os/2. While I'm sure those are great > >systems, I don'town a single piece of hardware or software that isn't >Win95 specific. So now I need to upgrade to Win95 from 3.1. I have >never done this before, but remember hearing horror stories about >conflicts and such.Can anyone with experience with this (I seem to >remember from a long time ago someone named "Hitchhiker") drop me >a line with any suggestions that might make this a little smother. > >Regards, Jeff >elvislives@mindspring.com > > > I'd rather keep OS/2, but just delete Windows 3.1, if you wish. BTW, you can even have PC-DOS 6.3/Win 3.1, OS/2 Warp, and Win95 on the same partition and still boot from each. I had that on my server before, but I only had 95 on for < 1 week because I preferred Linux and OS/2. Paul