SPONSORED LINKS
On Thu, 16 Oct 1997 14:51:07 +0200 (MEST), Christoph Eyrich wrote: >On Wed, 15 Oct 1997, Paul Khoury wrote: > >> >Has anyone compared the performance between the 560E (150Mh) and >> >the 560(133Mh/DS). Is is worth the difference in $. > >> PC MAG's reviews, it says that sometimes faster processors really >> aren't that much >> faster than say 133 compared to a 120, or even a 100, and they are >> usually slower > >As far as I know, the 560E features 2nd level cache which makes it >considerably faster. > > >Christoph Eyrich > > >eyrich@zedat.fu-berlin.de > > > I guess that'd make a difference, but I never notice, because most of my systems now are older XTs, PC's and PS/2's. I only have 2 machines with cache, the Pentuim Server with 256K of L2. Also, does anybody know what other systems have cache in them? Paul