SPONSORED LINKS
On Mon, 15 Dec 97 9:43:56 HST, ross@math.hawaii.edu (David Ross) wrote: >Yes and no; early versions of doublespace (like the one with OSR1, like you have) had some >problems (though are still safer than FAT32). If you can get the later version (i.e., >with Plus!, or the even later version off someone's OSR2 CD - it might even be available at >the MS web site, though somehow I doubt it), this is quite stable. Still, it is a good idea >not to compress the whole drive. What I do is create a 'virtual' compressed drive D, on which >I put noncritical stuff (i.e., everything I need to boot, and all mission-critical files >go on C, everything else [including Office 97] on D. Works very well - I had a very usable >system even on my old 701, with a 340meg HD. Any performance degradation or other adverse effects of using the latest version of doublespace?