[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Performance specs for TP701
<<I would rather rely on Drystones and Whetstones, since they
do more of what I'm looking for. The SI benchmark seems akward, and
more of something a WinDO$ fanatic would use.
>>
Drystone is known to be a completely broken benchmark, and no one should
rely on it for anything (broken means that a compiler can easily subvert
the test, and many compilers do).
Whetstone is a little more reliable if you are measuring floating-point
performance, but gives a completely inadequate reflection of cacehe
effects. The livermore loops are probably much more reliable, or
the new Spec suite.