SPONSORED LINKS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 701C Modem: Doesn't work in DOS? -Reply -Reply



On Thu, 29 Jan 1998 11:20:03 -0600, Mike Hunziker wrote:

><snip>
>>Haa, I'd rather have a DOS program then a Win95 one.
>>Yah, but for people who only use the computer as a *tool* in their
>>business and don't care about the OS
>
>Paul:
>>Except for the people I know.  THey wouldn't put a Microsoft OS on
>>their computers
>>if they were paid to.
>
>Sorry to clue you in Paul, but most of us ARE getting paid to do just that.
>My company dictates the policy and if you want to remain gainfully
>employed you comply.  I have more latitude than most here since I'm 
>a system administrator but that really is not the point.   
><snip>

Unless you're self employeed, or your company uses ONLY OS/2 and Linux.

Most of the people on the other list are administrators, self employed, or OS/2
technicians.  And some even have to use Windows at work, but have suggested
OS/2.

>
>> so much, it would be nice to have a
>>consistent standard since they don't have the time to be worrying about
>>whether it runs in DOS or Windows. That is, since most of the world
>>(like it or not) is using some form of Windows, most business people
>>have >gotten used to the GUI interface. 
>
>This is 100% true, period.
>
Don't count on it.

>>That's not neccesarily true, there are *many* businesses that run on
>>OS/2, Linux,
>><yuck> the Mac OS, etc.  It's not completely a Windows world.
>
>We are in the process of getting rid of all traces of OS/2. 
>
>I know some ISP's that run Linux but why on Earth would I run my
>financial company on a freeware os?

My ISP uses FreeBSD, and I find it more reliable than Earthlink, my previous
provider, who used NT.  Probably the reason I had problems staying connected.

 If a critical server drops I need
>parts and services NOW. That's one reason I'm sending this out on a
>760E, we leverage off an IBM support contract.  We also leverage off 
>Hewlett Packard for Unix servers and software. 
>
>I've run linux and I prefer hpux over it.
>

Well, I believe it's all based on personal preferences.
I look at it this way - you can't judge a book by it's cover.

There's a good OS metaphor.

Okay, I'm off my soapbox.  Let's keep this personal to avoid wasted
bandwidth.

-- 
Paul

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Paul Khoury
pkhoury@loop.com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Running OS/2 2.1 on my PS/2 55SX
Running OS/2 Warp 3 on my "DX2-50"
Running OS/2 Warp 4 on my server and ThinkPad 701CS

Donate your idle CPU time to a needy cause.
Join Team Warped and help to crack RC5-64!
Check out http://www.ionet.net/~colin/rc5.html for more information.

The Operating System/2 Version is 4.00 
Revision 9.029 
There are 26 Processes with 90 Threads.
This machine's uptime is 0d 5h 55m 28s 265ms.