[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: cost effectiveness of upgrading laptops
Haven't upgraded to the 560 - I expect to keep my 701 for a while. I
agree with you about the form factor - the 701 is lovely. I've used it
in interviews & meetings, keeping it on my lap, and it's nicely
inconspicuous. The black colour helps, too.
One problem I've had lately, tho it seems to have subsided since I gave
the keyboard a good vacuuming, is some kind of spurious trackpoint
button signals, resulting in the right button menu appearing at odd
times. Solutions, anyone?
Ciao, Tom
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
FROM:Tom Trottier, MBA Senior Technical Architect
SHL Systemhouse Ltd. Ottawa Global Development Centre
*50 O'Connor St. Suite 501, Ottawa K1P 6L2 Canada
(+1 613 236-6604x5539 fax 232-5182 :ttrottier@shl.com
>----------
>From: ross@math.hawaii.edu[SMTP:ross@math.hawaii.edu]
>Sent: 1997 November 03 - Monday 05:26
>To: jasonlin@nwu.edu
>Cc: thinkpad@cs.utk.edu
>Subject: re: cost effectiveness of upgrading laptops
>
>I think this is exactly what the would-be upgraders are wondering - namely,
>whether it would be more cost-effective to upgrade their old machines
>for $400 or so rather than spend $1300 on a P133 TP560 (or $850 on
>the P100 version). I doubt there are many people for whom the tradeoff is
>the
>latest model 560E vs. the upgrade.
>
>Also, some people (myself included) love the TP701 form factor, and would
>prefer
>a faster machine in that box than even a P133 in a TP560 box. Even though I
>myself moved to the 560, I still miss my 701.
>
>>
>> I know there has recently been a lot of discussion about upgrading their
>> Thinkpad 701. I have a question related to the cost effectiveness of
>> upgrading laptops in general.
>>
>> I have noticed that many people, including some on this list, seem to be
>> enthralled with buying the newest and unfortunately, most expensive
>> laptops. (Note: I am not making any value judgements!!!) I am just
>> wondering if this is necessary and what is the rationale behind doing so.
>> For example, is it really worth it to spend $1000 to $2000 more for a
>> P166MMX machine vs. a P133 machine? Consequently, it also seems like a
>> good many people want to upgrade their computer because they are unwilling
>> to part with their computer which had originally bought at such a high
>> price which has now greatly depreciated.
>>
>> Why not prevent oneself from falling into the upgrade temptation by buying
>> a lower end model. I've gone through quite a few computers in the past
>> couple of years. My strategy has always been to buy a lower end model at a
>> bargain price, use it for a while, and then part with it at a minimal or no
>> loss.
>>
>>
>
>