SPONSORED LINKS
On Mon, 03 Nov 1997 13:27:13 -0600, Jason Lin wrote: >I know there has recently been a lot of discussion about upgrading their >Thinkpad 701. I have a question related to the cost effectiveness of >upgrading laptops in general. > >I have noticed that many people, including some on this list, seem to be >enthralled with buying the newest and unfortunately, most expensive >laptops. (Note: I am not making any value judgements!!!) I am just >wondering if this is necessary and what is the rationale behind doing so. >For example, is it really worth it to spend $1000 to $2000 more for a >P166MMX machine vs. a P133 machine? Consequently, it also seems like a >good many people want to upgrade their computer because they are unwilling >to part with their computer which had originally bought at such a high >price which has now greatly depreciated. > >Why not prevent oneself from falling into the upgrade temptation by buying >a lower end model. I've gone through quite a few computers in the past >couple of years. My strategy has always been to buy a lower end model at a >bargain price, use it for a while, and then part with it at a minimal or no >loss. > > I understand what you mean Jason, but usually those of us find it hard to part with our machine because of the time we have spent "bonding" to it, and customizing it. For example, I find it hard to part with my 701 (even though I H A T E that dumb Trackwrite keyboard) and just go on to another, considering what I've done with it. I guess for large companies with volume users it would be a better upgrade pattern. Just some spare change. <g> Paul