SPONSORED LINKS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

re: cost effectiveness of upgrading laptops



At 01:27 PM 11/3/97 -0600, Jason Lin wrote:
>I have noticed that many people, including some on this list, seem to be
>enthralled with buying the newest and unfortunately, most expensive
>laptops.
Well, apart from being a lot of fun, the most expensive laptops tend to
have features that some folks consider "must have". I would love to buy the
newest and most powerful ThinkPads available, but really cheap! :-)

>For example, is it really worth it to spend $1000 to $2000 more for a
>P166MMX machine vs. a P133 machine?
I'd say absolutely not. Of course, it kinda depends on how much you value
your time. I value mine pretty highly. The thing is, the extra $1-2K
typically buys you a lot more than just a few MHz of extra speed. It
generally buys (at least) a bigger hard drive, more memory, bigger/better
screen, CD-ROM, video capture, etc., stuff like that.

>Consequently, it also seems like a
>good many people want to upgrade their computer because they are unwilling
>to part with their computer which had originally bought at such a high
>price which has now greatly depreciated.
I've upgraded my TP755CE in two ways. I have upgraded the RAM; first to
24Meg, then to 40Meg. I have upgraded the disk capacity; first to 810Meg,
then to 2.1Gig. Oh, yes. I also disabled the Mwave modem and upgraded to a
Megahertz PCMCIA dual modem and Ethernet card. Part of the reason I
upgraded rather than buying new was the fact that the upgrades I have done
cost a small amount, relative to the cost of a whole new computer. Also,
with 40Meg and 2.1Gig, I expect this system to be a useful system even
after I "replace" it with something better. I'd happily part with this
system for a better one. But I haven't seen a ThinkPad come along with a
10.4" TFT display, 2.1Gig of disk, and 40Meg of RAM for under $600. When I
replace this puppy, it will be because there is a feature in the new
ThinkPad that I "must have". We're getting close, already. I would *really*
like an internal CD-ROM and 14" display. But, I am sick to death of being
out of IRQs. My next ThinkPad will (I hope) consolidate a bunch of the
"slow" devices (keyboard, mouse, serial port, printer port, IrDA port,
etc.) onto an internal USB, with USB connectors added to the back "port area".


>Why not prevent oneself from falling into the upgrade temptation by buying
>a lower end model.  I've gone through quite a few computers in the past
>couple of years.
The process of "going through quite a few computers" takes time. It took me
a couple of weeks just to find the time to swap ISA modem cards in my
desktop. Although, in some ways, a fun thing to do, it isn't something that
I want to do all that often. Back a few years, when I used Multics and UNIX
systems, computers were more fun. While still fun at some levels, MS
Windows systems are a real pain in the rear. Every time one upgrades
anything, no matter how minor, it's a major project. Sometimes, I wonder
how people who haven't been doing this as long as I have manage it at all.
Don't even get me started on how IE4.0 has screwed up my desktop system and
my business partner's desktop *and* laptop systems. (Lucky I didn't install
it on my ThinkPad, which is my primary system!)

-- 
Ron.