SPONSORED LINKS
On Sat, 27 Dec 1997 05:32:22 GMT, epbrown wrote: > I never had the display looked at, and odds are that it will never >get fixed now; I dropped the laptop and chipped the case, so I expect >IBM to insist any problems are on my end :-( > On the plus side, the defects I mention still aren't noticeable (I >have to look for them to see them) and haven't affected my enjoyment >of the 560 in the least so far. > I've never had occasion to attach the devices you mention, since I >don't own any of those things - I'm a laptop-only person. Perhaps >someone else on the list will chime in? I will say that the >performance is superior to a Pentium 60 (they made them that slow?) >without a doubt, despite the lack of L2 cache. Well, get a load of this - I heard that they made a Pentium 50 (!) during development, and might have actually come out with out. Talk about one slow Pentium. Paul