SPONSORED LINKS
On Sun, 5 Apr 98 07:53:28 EDT, Robert Dewar wrote: >This seems a bit off topic for TP, but I am reporting OS/2 performance >on TP, so I guess it is OK :-) > >I just want to note that HPFS386 makes a HUGE difference to performance >on a machine with decent memory (I have 140 megs and use a 50 meg disk >cache). It's night and day. FOr example, linking the compiler I am working >on (GNAT, an Ada 95 compiler with a very nice OS/2 port), used to take >90 seconds with HPFS and a maximum sized cache. It now takes 4 seconds. > So, should I change the IFS line in my CONFIG.SYS to what it says on my Warp Server machine (I've already had HPFS386 in a directory here)? How much memory is enough to see a noticable difference? I have 24 MB on both servers, and this ThinkPad. Thanks. -- Paul Khoury <pkhoury@loop.com> http://pkhoury.dyn.ml.org Sent from my ThinkPad 701CS running OS/2 Warp 4.0, Fixpack 5 There are 22 Processes with 85 Threads. This machine's uptime is 0d 7h 15m 37s 765ms.