SPONSORED LINKS
On Tue, 7 Apr 98 11:39:53 EDT, Robert Dewar wrote: ><< If the sender *chooses* to send it in a form that fewer people can read, >that's his choice. He should do so knowing in advance that it won't be >universally readable, but that shouldn't prevent him from sending it. > > It certainly doesn't impose the bandwidth issues that sending a binary >does, so it should not be an issue that gets anyone excited. Can't see it? > Delete it. Obviously the sender didn't care enough about you to send it >in a plain text form. It was his mistake (unless he weighed the >alternatives and felt sending with fancy formatting was necessary). >>> > >Well sure it is the sender's choice, but it is annoying to readers. This >mailing list is *just* worth being on for me, but it is marginal. If a lot >of messages started appearing in junk formats like this, I would get off >it. Of course that's probably reasonable anyway. Maybe I will at this stage >anyway. > If I get more junk messages, I will bounce them back to the sender, and I don't care what flames I get (and that's ALL recipients). -- Paul Khoury <pkhoury@loop.com> http://pkhoury.dyn.ml.org Sent from my ThinkPad 701CS running OS/2 Warp 4.0, Fixpack 5 There are 22 Processes with 89 Threads. This machine's uptime is 0d 3h 22m 7s 804ms.