[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 560x v. 600
On Mon, 06 Apr 98 22:47:28 -0800, Paul Khoury wrote:
>On Mon, 06 Apr 1998 09:17:11 -0400, richard wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 05 Apr 98 03:13:16 , "Paul Khoury" <pkhoury@loop.com> wrote:
>>
>>>If it's that expensive, you might as well consider the 770 if you don't mind the extra
>weigh too
>>>much, unless the 600 is a faster machine.
>>
>>
>>The extra weight is a major factor.
>>
>Depending on who you're talking to. I'm 6'5", so I have a lot of back room
>for my computers. Now, carrying one of my two backpacs is hard.
>
>For me, as long as the machine is under 8 lbs. itself, it's okay.
>(The SPARCbook is also a Magnesium alloy case, making it heavier than
>plastic).
>
>
>Now carrying heavy peripherals is a major setback for me (CD-ROM, etc).
>
>--
>Paul Khoury <pkhoury@loop.com> http://pkhoury.dyn.ml.org
>Sent from my P75 Server running OS/2 Warp 4.0, Fixpack 6
>There are 27 Processes with 93 Threads.
>This machine's uptime is 3d 9h 42m 38s 335ms.
>
--
Paul Khoury <pkhoury@loop.com> http://pkhoury.dyn.ml.org
Sent from my ThinkPad 701CS running OS/2 Warp 4.0, Fixpack 5
There are 24 Processes with 89 Threads.
This machine's uptime is 0d 1h 21m 54s 695ms.