SPONSORED LINKS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 560x v. 600



On Mon, 06 Apr 1998 09:17:11 -0400, richard wrote:

>On Sun, 05 Apr 98 03:13:16 , "Paul Khoury" <pkhoury@loop.com> wrote:
>
>>If it's that expensive, you might as well consider the 770 if you don't mind the extra 
weigh too
>>much, unless the 600 is a faster machine.
>
>
>The extra weight is a major factor.
>
Depending on who you're talking to.  I'm 6'5", so I have a lot of back room
for my computers.  Now, carrying one of my two backpacs is hard.

For me, as long as the machine is under 8 lbs. itself, it's okay.
(The SPARCbook is also a Magnesium alloy case, making it heavier than
plastic).


Now carrying heavy peripherals is a major setback for me (CD-ROM, etc).

-- 
Paul Khoury <pkhoury@loop.com>  http://pkhoury.dyn.ml.org
Sent from my P75 Server running OS/2 Warp 4.0, Fixpack 6
There are 27 Processes with 93 Threads.
This machine's uptime is 3d 9h 42m 38s 335ms.